Nuclear Protection
Latest news:
Sid Goodman is the author of the recently
released book "Asleep At The Geiger Counter":
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/
A NEW EUROPE AND SAFE EUROPE: NO HIGH-RISK NUCLEAR PLANTS IN AN EXPANDED EU
(Bankwatch Apr 15) Statement of the CEE Bankwatch Network regarding the signing
of the EU Accession Treaty:
"The eastward expansion of the European Union is a historic chance for us to
close outdated, high-risk nuclear reactors in the former communist countries.
On the eve of the signing of the accession treaty, however, we do not see any
clear commitments from either national governments or the European Commission
to shut down these dangerous reactors, notably Kozloduy units 1-4 (Bulgaria),
Ignalina units 1 and 2 (Lithuania) and Bohunice V1 (Slovakia).
Since 1989 the European Commission, through its Phare program, has made
available nearly ?700 million for nuclear safety programs in Central and
Eastern Europe. The European Union, however, has failed to enforce closure. In
fact EU grants -- which were never intended to increase the lifetime of high-
risk reactors -- have helped delay early closure of these nuclear facilities,
and almost all the high risk reactors in the accession countries are still
operating. Only two reactors (Kozloduy 1 and 2) have been voluntarily and
permanently closed (at the end of 2002) and there is clear commitment to close
only one reactor more (Ignalina 1, by 2004). The governments of accession
countries have ignored previously reached agreements concerning these
dangerous reactors and are continuing to operate the facilities.
During accession negotiations, the governments of the candidate countries had
much motivation to accept the Commission's goal of shutting down high- risk
nuclear units, since they saw decommissioning as a prerequisite for accession.
However, the national governments proved resistant not only to setting closure
dates, preparing decommissioning programs or fulfilling other necessary steps
and conditions, but apparently did not want to shut down the nuclear units at
all. Due to much pressure from the Commission, some progress was achieved on
Kozloduy units 1 and 2 and Ignalina unit 1. The future of the other nuclear
units remains uncertain. When the accession countries become member states,
they will lose any motivation to continue decommissioning and the future of
high-risk reactors will be even more uncertain.
We believe that the closure of the remaining high-risk reactors can and should
be undertaken as soon as possible. Moreover, decommissioning of these reactors
should be as transparent as possible and include mitigation measures to address
the social impact of closure on the nuclear plants' satellite towns. We urge
the Commission to keep pressure on the new member states to close these
high-risk nuclear units, and call on future decommissioning funds to be made
conditional upon concrete closure dates. We also call upon the European Union
and accession countries to sign legally binding agreements establishing clear
closure dates and timelines for shutting down these high-risk units. The New
Europe should be a safe Europe, free from high-risk nuclear reactors."
SITE OF THE MONTH: